Chandigarh, October 16, 2026: Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann has responded sharply to Union Home Minister Amit Shah over the issue of drug trafficking, urging him to take responsibility for drug-related developments instead of blaming the Punjab government.
In his response, Mann raised questions about the reported seizure of around 3,000 kg of heroin at Gujarat’s Kandla Port. He also referred to the Border Security Force’s jurisdiction along the international border while challenging the criticism directed at him.
The Punjab Chief Minister made the remarks in a post on social media platform X, where he questioned Shah’s approach to the issue and suggested that the Union Home Minister should seek proper advice before making public statements.
Political Tensions Rise Over Punjab’s Drug Problem
The exchange comes amid an ongoing political dispute over drug trafficking and the law-and-order situation in Punjab. Amit Shah’s comments on the drug menace have drawn a strong response from the state leadership, with the issue becoming a point of confrontation between the BJP and the Aam Aadmi Party.
The controversy has also intensified following the murder of anti-drug activist Parvinder Singh Jhota in Mansa. The case has triggered political reactions and renewed debate over efforts to tackle the drug problem in Punjab.
Drug Trafficking Becomes a Major Political Issue
Drug trafficking remains a significant concern in Punjab, with political parties facing questions over enforcement, border security and measures to prevent narcotics from reaching communities.
Mann’s latest remarks highlight the growing political disagreement over accountability and the responsibilities of the state and central governments in tackling the issue.
The statements from both sides are expected to keep the drug menace and Punjab’s security situation at the centre of political discussions in the coming days.
Note: The remarks and allegations mentioned in this report reflect the positions attributed to the respective political leaders. They should not be interpreted as independently verified conclusions about responsibility for drug trafficking.
